Hormone response elements (HREs) are considered enhancers, activating
transcription in a relatively position- and orientation-independent fa
shion. Upon binding to an HRE, steroid receptors presumably contact co
activators and/or proteins associated with the transcription initiatio
n complex. As a receptor target site is moved further from a fixed pos
ition such as the TATA box, not only will the spatial separation of th
e receptor with respect to its interaction partners change, so will th
e orientation due to the rotation of the DNA helix. Additional constra
ints may be imposed by the assembly of DNA into chromatin. Therefore,
we have endeavored to test rigorously the assertion that HRE action is
position independent. We have constructed a series of 42 chlorampheni
col acetyltransferase expression vectors that contain a single progest
erone/glucocorticoid receptor-binding site separated from a TATA box b
y 4 to 286 bp. The enhancer activity of the HRE was assessed after tra
nsient transfection of progesterone receptor-expressing fibroblasts. W
e find that the position of the HRE has a dramatic influence on induct
ion by progestins. When closely juxtaposed to the TATA box, the HRE wa
s unable to support a hormone response, perhaps due to direct steric h
indrance with the transcription initiation complex. Full activity was
gained by moving the HRE 10 bp further from the TATA sequence. As the
HRE was moved incrementally further, activity remained near maximal ov
er the next 26 bp. HRE activity then declined over the subsequent 26 b
p and remained low for another 2.5 helical turns. Surprisingly, a narr
ow window of HRE activity occurred at an HRE-TATA box separation of 90
-100 bp. Little or no hormone-induced transcriptional activity was obs
erved when the HRE was positioned further from the TATA box. The addit
ion of a second HRE or a basal (nuclear factor-1) element failed to re
lieve this constraint. A similar series of experiments was carried out
in a mammary carcinoma cell line that expressed high levels of both g
lucocorticoid and progestin receptors. Data in these cells indicate th
at glucocorticoids and progestins supported a similar HRE position-act
ivity profile, but this pattern of HRE activity was quite distinct fro
m that seen in fibroblasts. This may be indicative of cell type-specif
ic interactions between steroid receptors and adapter/coactivator prot
eins or cell type-specific activities such as acetylases or deacetylas
es participating in the steroid response.