Ah. Thomson et al., AN AUDIT OF THERAPEUTIC DRUG-MONITORING SERVICE PROVISION BY LABORATORIES PARTICIPATING IN AN EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT SCHEME, Therapeutic drug monitoring, 20(3), 1998, pp. 248-252
Therapeutic drug monitoring services were investigated in a questionna
ire sent to all subscribers to the United Kingdom National External Qu
ality Assessment Scheme for Therapeutic Drug Assays. Questions were po
sed on assay availability and use, target ranges, and reporting proced
ures for digoxin, lithium, phenytoin, phenobarbitone, carbamazepine, t
heophylline, and valproic acid. One hundred fifty-seven laboratories r
eplied and, except for lithium, 45% reported in mass units, 34% in mol
ar units, and 22% a mixture of mass and molar units. Target ranges for
lithium, digoxin, carbamazepine, and phenobarbitone mere highly varia
ble but ranges for phenytoin, theophylline, and valproic acid were mor
e consistent. Immunoassay was the most popular methodology although hi
gh-performance liquid chromatography was commonly used for anticonvuls
ants. Paper copies of results were provided by 93% of laboratories, 40
% reported by telephone, 12% by fax, and 25% by computer. Additional d
ata, mainly dose, time of last dose, and duration of therapy were requ
ested by 55% to 67% of laboratories. Grades of staff authorizing resul
ts ranged from nurses to senior consultants, and collaboration with ph
armacists occurred in 26% of laboratories. Most laboratories provided
a daily analytical service and 73% offered a 24-hour emergency service
. This audit unexpectedly identified use of a wide range of target con
centrations, particularly for digoxin and lithium.