The aim of the study was to perform a long-time evaluation of tunnel r
estorations made in a general dental practice concerning survival time
and type of failures. 267 Class I (87%) and II (13%) tunnel restorati
ons in permanent teeth on 193 patients - mostly teenagers and young ad
ults - were evaluated at annual recalls. The observation time-span was
1-7 years. The restoration material was a conventional glass ionomer
cement in Class I tunnels and a silver cermet glass ionomer cement in
Class II tunnels. The yearly failure rate was 7 % and the 50 % surviva
l time was 6 years. The reasons for replacement were: marginal ridge f
racture (41%), recurrent caries (40%) and cavitation in approximal ena
mel (19%). No differences in failure rate between Class I and TI tunne
ls could be seen, but recurrent caries was more frequent in Class I tu
nnels. Restorations made during the second year of the study were more
successful, indicating a learning effect. Class I tunnel restorations
in general practice can be an alternative to conventional Class II re
storations with narrow indications, i.e. patients with relatively low
caries activity, small approximal lesions in combination with small de
mineralization zones in the enamel wall.