S. Helsley et al., A COMPARISON OF N,N-DIMETHYLTRYPTAMINE, HARMALINE, AND SELECTED CONGENERS IN RATS TRAINED WITH LSD AS A DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS, Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 22(4), 1998, pp. 649-663
1. A series of N-substituted tryptamines was compared with a series of
beta-carbolines in rats trained to discriminate LSD (0.1 mg/kg) from
saline. 2. Intermediate levels of substitution were elicited by MDMT (
76.4%), DMT (77.9%), and DET (48.7%). 6-F-DET produced 41.3% LSD-appro
priate responding at a dose of 6.0 mg/kg but only 4 of 8 subjects comp
leted the test session thus precluding statistical analysis. Bufotenin
e (25.8%) also failed to substitute. Although none of the tryptamines
substituted completely for LSD, the pattern of substitution is consona
nt with what is known of their activity in humans. MDMT, DMT, and DET
are well established in the literature as hallucinogens but the same c
annot be said for 6-F-DET and bufotenine. 3. Of the beta-carbolines te
sted, none substituted for LSD completely and only harmane elicited in
termediate substitution (49.5%). No significant generalization of the
LSD stimulus to 6-methoxyharmalan, harmaline, or THBC was observed. Th
us, in contrast to the tryptamines, scant ability to substitute for LS
D was observed in the beta-carbolines tested. 4. Taken together, the p
resent data indicate that the representative tryptamines employed in t
he present study exhibit greater similarity to the LSD stimulus than d
o representative beta-carbolines. The receptor interactions responsibl
e for these differences remain to be determined.