Gc. Berlet et al., DISTAL BICEPS BRACHII TENDON REPAIR - AN IN-VITRO BIOMECHANICAL STUDYOF TENDON REATTACHMENT, American journal of sports medicine, 26(3), 1998, pp. 428-432
Clinical reports suggest that suture anchors can simplify repair of di
stal biceps tendon avulsions. In this study, fixation strengths of Mit
ek and Statak suture anchors were compared with strength of reattachme
nt using transosseous suture tunnels in eight cadaveric radii. Cyclic
loading and load-to-failure testing were performed: No specimen failed
during testing to 50 N for 3600 cycles; however, four of the Mitek an
chors and one of the Statak anchors protruded out of the medullary can
al. The mean load to failure of the Mitek suture anchor complexes was
220 +/- 54 N, that of the Statak suture anchor complexes was 187 +/- 6
4 N, and that of the transosseous sutures was 307 +/- 142 N. There was
no significant difference in the failure load or mechanism of failure
between the Statak and Mitek anchors. Transosseous sutures failed at
significantly greater loads on static testing than the suture anchors.
Cyclic loading results suggest that the bony fixation achieved using
these three techniques should be sufficient to allow immediate passive
mobilization of the elbow after surgery. Protrusion of the suture anc
hors out of the tuberosity during cyclic loading is a concern because
of potential development of a gap at the repair site and interference
with forearm rotation.