Sd. Kirby et al., PERIPHERAL CUES AND INVOLVEMENT LEVEL - INFLUENCES ON ACCEPTANCE OF AMAMMOGRAPHY MESSAGE, Journal of health communication, 3(2), 1998, pp. 119-135
The elaboration likelihood model (ELM) suggests that some communicatio
n elements are processed differently depending on a receiver's involve
ment with the message topic. We hypothesized that women with high leve
ls of breast cancer involvement would be more influenced by a mammogra
phy message's arguments than by the message's peripheral cues and, con
versely, that women with low levels of involvement would be more influ
enced by a mammography message's peripheral cues than by the message's
arguments. We exposed 89 low-income African American women aged 40 to
65 years to two repetitions of a mammography promotion public service
announcement embedded as a commercial within a television talk show.
We used a 2 (involvement level) x 2 (argument strength) x 2 (periphera
l cue favorability) factorial posttest-only design. The analysis detec
ted a significant main effect for involvement and an interaction betwe
en peripheral cue favorability and involvement. High-involvement women
reported stronger intentions than did low-involvement women to seek a
dditional mammography information, regardless of argument strength or
cue favorability. Low-involvement women reported stronger intentions t
o seek more mammography information only when exposed to the favorable
cue condition The analysis detected no effect for argument strength i
n high-or low-involvement women. The ELM appears useful for designing
mammography messages. As many women may have low involvement with brea
st cancer, mammography promotion messages that include favorable perip
heral cues may be more likely to impact mammography information seekin
g than argument-based-only messages.