Disparities in load stiffness were used to differentiate and character
ize pinch-force, finger-span, and pinch-effort matching in two experim
ents. All subjects squeezed a spring-loaded manipulandum in each hand
using three-finger pinch. Subjects in the first experiment were instru
cted explicitly to match one of the three continua. Subjects matching
force or span were told to attend carefully to sensations from the han
d or arm and to ignore differences in the effort required to make the
sensations equal. They had to achieve and hold a particular target for
ce with the reference hand and then match force or span with the oppos
ite hand, usually against a spring with a different stiffness. These s
ubjects were given as much time as necessary to make their matches and
were told which hand was serving as the reference in each trial. Effo
rt-matching subjects were told to ignore peripheral sensations and to
match effort or motor commands. These subjects were not told which han
d was the reference and were given only 1 s to make a match, so they m
ade matches by rapidly squeezing both manipulanda simultaneously and,
presumably, with the same voluntary motor command. The matching behavi
ors of the three groups were clearly distinguishable and were consiste
nt with instructions. Results were similar whether different subjects
were assigned different instructions or the same subjects performed al
l three match types. In a second experiment, naive subjects were given
purposely ambiguous instructions without reference to a specific cont
inuum and had no time or accuracy constraints. Subjects produced the s
ame three sensorimotor behaviors obtained with explicit instructions,
showing that the different behaviors were not artifacts of strict prot
ocols. Taken together, the results show that force, span, and effort a
re distinct sensorimotor continua that can be judged reliably.