PREVENTION OF INTESTINAL ADHESIONS AFTER LAPAROTOMY IN A RAT MODEL - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY

Citation
G. Zamir et al., PREVENTION OF INTESTINAL ADHESIONS AFTER LAPAROTOMY IN A RAT MODEL - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY, Research in experimental medicine, 197(6), 1998, pp. 349-353
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, Research & Experimental
ISSN journal
03009130
Volume
197
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
349 - 353
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-9130(1998)197:6<349:POIAAL>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
We prospectively studied the effect of a foam composite containing gly cerin, propylene glycol, polyol, stearine, stearate and silicone oil, which is known to form a temporary barrier layer when applied to epith elial surface, on adhesion prevention in rats. The small intestine abr asion model was used for creation of adhesions. Sixty male Sabra rats of a mean weight of 295+/-23 g were randomly assigned into four groups : group 1 (n = 20) underwent laparotomy and abrasion; group 2 (n = 20) underwent laparotomy, abrasion and intraperitoneal instillation of th e foam composite; group 3 (n = 10) underwent laparotomy with abrasion and a second laparotomy with adhesiolysis 2 weeks later; and group 4 ( n = 10), was treated in the same way as group 3 but during the second laparotomy the foam composite was instilled intraperitoneally. All ani mals were relaparotomized 2 weeks (groups 1 and 2) and 4 weeks (groups 3 and 4) after the initial laparotomy for adhesion scoring performed by a blinded independent investigator using the standard 0-3 adhesion grading score. Representative specimens of small intestine and liver f rom animals in groups 2 and 4 were analyzed. A significantly lower mea n adhesion score was noted in group 2 (1.15+/-0.3) compared with that of group 1 (2.65+/-0.1) or group 3 (2.60+/-0.1) (P<0.01). Group 4 had a significantly lower score (1.4+/-0.3) than group 3 or group 1 (P<0.0 5). There was no significant difference in the mean adhesion score bet ween groups 1 and 3. Histological examination revealed no evidence of residual foam composite or adverse reaction to its use in the intestin e and liver. The foam composite tested may reduce the severity of inte stinal adhesions after laparotomy and may also reduce the severity of recurrent adhesions after adhesiolysis. Intraperitoneal use of this co mposite is safe in rats. The exact mechanism of action is unclear but may be related to the formation of a temporary microlayer that coats t he injured surface of the intestine and facilitates healing without ad hesion formation. Further investigation is needed to evaluate its full potential.