UTILIZATION OF WELL-CHILD CARE SERVICES FOR AFRICAN-AMERICAN INFANTS IN A LOW-INCOME COMMUNITY - RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CASE-MANAGEMENT HOME VISITATION INTERVENTION
Ma. Schuster et al., UTILIZATION OF WELL-CHILD CARE SERVICES FOR AFRICAN-AMERICAN INFANTS IN A LOW-INCOME COMMUNITY - RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CASE-MANAGEMENT HOME VISITATION INTERVENTION, Pediatrics, 101(6), 1998, pp. 999-1005
Objective. To evaluate a case management/home visitation intervention
to improve access to and utilization of well-child care (WCC) visits.
Study Design. Randomized, controlled trial with baseline and follow-up
interview surveys. Mothers and infants in the intervention group were
assigned to a case manager who made at least four home visits during
the infant's first year of life. In addition, the case managers contac
ted clients by telephone and mail to see if they had kept their WCC ap
pointments and to follow up on other issues. Sample and Data Collectio
n. A population-based random sample of African-American mothers of new
borns from South Central Los Angeles: 185 mothers in the intervention
group and 180 in the control group completed both interview surveys. T
he principal outcome variable was number of WCC visits. Additional out
come variables included the child's type of insurance, the number of m
onths with insurance coverage during the first year of life, age when
first enrolled in Medi-Cal, age at the first WCC visit, usual source o
f WCC, travel time to the usual source of care, whether the child had
a regular provider, and whether the child ever needed care but did not
get it. Results. There was little change in the overall distribution
of number of WCC visits during the first year of life. Comparisons of
the cumulative numbers of visits for each possible cutoff showed that
children in the intervention group were more likely than children in t
he control group to have at least four visits (81% vs 70%). Because th
is split was identified empirically rather than through an antecedent
hypothesis, we conducted a Smirnov test to account for multiple compar
isons. This test showed a reduced level of significance. Other outcome
variables did not show significant differences for the control and in
tervention groups. Conclusions. In light of the high expense of this i
ntervention, our evaluation shows that our moderate-intensity case man
agement and home visitation program is not an effective way to increas
e the number of WCC visits.