S. Shahangian et al., A SYSTEM TO MONITOR A PORTION OF THE TOTAL TESTING PROCESS IN MEDICALCLINICS AND LABORATORIES - FEASIBILITY OF A SPLIT-SPECIMEN DESIGN, Archives of pathology and laboratory medicine, 122(6), 1998, pp. 503-511
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology,"Medical Laboratory Technology","Medicine, Research & Experimental
Objective.-The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of
using a prototype split-specimen design to assess integrity of a porti
on of the total testing process in medical clinics and laboratories. D
esign.-Two or three tubes of venous blood were collected from 177 pati
ents for analysis of one of three analytes (serum potassium, serum tot
al cholesterol, and whole-blood hemoglobin). Patients were seen at one
of the nine clinics participating in this study. In all cases, one tu
be of blood from each patient was sent to a commercial referral labora
tory, and the other tube(s) forwarded to the laboratory that routinely
tested specimens for the clinic (participating laboratory) for analys
is. Each participating laboratory removed a preanalysis and sometimes
a post-analysis aliquot from each specimen and forwarded these to the
referral laboratory for analysis. Setting.-The study was conducted in
six physician office laboratories (three serving 1 to 4 [mean, 2.7] in
ternists and three serving 3 to 24 [mean, 12] family physicians) and t
hree hospital laboratories (serving hospitals with 100 to more than 70
0 beds). Patients.-Study patients were voluntary participants and prov
ided informed consent. Patient age ranged from 18 to 80 years, and for
all the laboratory test was specifically ordered for clinical reasons
. Patients who were unable or unwilling to provide informed consent, t
hose for whom testing would require that they provide more than by fin
gerstick, and those with results that were part of a laboratory test p
rofile were excluded. Main Outcome Measures.-Two main outcome measures
were assessed: (1) percent differences between split-specimen results
exceeding the maximum allowable imprecision level, which was based on
published biological variation data (defined as one-half of the intra
individual percent coefficient of variation), for each analyte (result
discrepancies); and (2) all ''problems'' (defined as departures from
standard operating procedures) that could be documented by retrospecti
ve review of all relevant medical and laboratory records. Results.-The
rate of result discrepancies was 1 in 20 (5%) for patients in whom he
moglobin was analyzed, 12 in 57 (21%) for patients in whom potassium w
as analyzed, and 1 in 60 (2%) for patients in whom total cholesterol w
as analyzed. Results of samples obtained during the aliquoting and sto
rage phases of the total testing process were subject to study-induced
problems and were generally not useful in tracing problems to specifi
c stages of the testing process. A total of 28 problems (involving 26
patients) were documented, but only 6 problems were due to routine tes
ting professes. Conclusions.-The feasibility and limitations of a spli
t-specimen design to detect result discrepancies were demonstrated. Mo
st documented problems (22 of 28, or 79%) were study induced. To asses
s integrity of the total testing process, such problems need to be avo
ided.