Two different makes of bioimpedance spectrometer (UniQuest-SEAC SFB3 a
nd Xitron 4000B) were used for a series of measurements on volunteers
and patients in intensive care. Although each machine was accurate ove
r the frequency range 5 to 500 kHz when bench tested on model resistor
-capacitor circuits, significant differences in their recorded impedan
ce parameters appeared when used in vivo, especially on intensive care
patients. A series of laboratory tests was performed on each machine
simulating the situation in vivo to identify possible reasons for thes
e differences. Whilst stray capacitance in the environment was identif
ied as the major contributor to variability in high-frequency performa
nce, interaction between electrode impedance and lead positioning was
also a factor. The observed phase shift with frequency or time delay (
T-d) used in the Xitron modelling software appears to be the result of
a time constant caused by stray capacitance and so is unlikely to hav
e any biological meaning. Significant differences in the in vivo numer
ical values produced by bioimpedance spectrometers may be attributed t
o instrument design, data processing and, in particular, the clinical
environment.