M. Gottlicher et al., TRANSCRIPTIONAL CROSS-TALK, THE 2ND MODE OF STEROID-HORMONE RECEPTOR ACTION, Journal of molecular medicine, 76(7), 1998, pp. 480-489
Citations number
123
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, Research & Experimental","Genetics & Heredity","Medical Laboratory Technology
Physiological and therapeutic activities of glucocorticoids and other
steroid hormones are mediated by the family of steroid hormone recepto
rs. In addition to the classical mode of receptor action which involve
s binding as a dimer to regulatory sequences in target gene promoters
and subsequent activation of transcription, a second mode of action is
based predominantly on protein-protein interactions. As the paradigm
of this so-called transcriptional cross-talk, the glucocorticoid recep
tor (GR) and the AP-1 transcription factor interact on target gene pro
moters which contain only a binding site for either one of the two tra
nscription factors. Most frequently negative interference of both fact
ors with each other's activity has been observed, for example, when AP
-1 is composed of c-Fos and c-Jun; however, synergism is also possible
under cell-specific conditions and when AP-1 is a homodimer of c-Jun.
Since the detection of the GR/AP-1 cross-talk numerous other examples
of transcription factor interactions have been described. Many member
s of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, including class II rece
ptors, have been shown to participate in such cross-talk. Moreover, th
e transcription factor families of NF-kappa B/Rel as well as Stat, Oct
, and C/EBP are engaged in cross-talk with steroid receptors. Despite
the identification of a multitude of target genes which appear to be r
egulated by this type of transcription factor interaction, the exact m
olecular mechanism of the cross-talk has not yet been elucidated. This
review discusses the current models to explain the molecular events o
f transcription factor cross-talk. Concepts are emphasized which sugge
st that the classical and the cross-talk mode of steroid receptor acti
on can be triggered separately by the choice of specific ligands. A fi
nal section summarizes the partially contradictory data which assign a
certain type of receptor action to a biological response particularly
in the immune system.