The proposal is made that writing of national or regional floras is pr
emature, and that systematic resources should be directed toward the p
reparation of monographs with cladistic analyses. This proposal result
s from one major consideration: that the preparation of floras does no
t require rigorous analysis of species definition and delimitation, an
d therefore the basic data (i.e. the species circumscriptions) are mor
e unreliable than that in monographs. Furthermore, contrary to some pu
blished arguments, the data in floras are not presented and summarised
in a format compatible with other areas of comparative and applied bi
ology, whereas it is otherwise in a monograph with cladistic analysis.
This proposition is based on the author's experience in preparing bot
h monographs and floristic treatments.