Background: An increase in masseter muscle tone in response to halothane or
succinylcholine anesthesia (or both) can be observed in healthy persons. T
hus the authors compared the fiber-type halothane and succinylcholine sensi
tivities in human masseter and vastus lateralis muscles.
Methods: Masseter and vastus lateralis muscle segments were obtained from 1
3 and 9 healthy persons, respectively, After chemical skinning of a single
fiber and loading the sarcoplasmic reticulum with Ca++ 0.16 mu M solution,
halothane (0.5-4 vol% bubbled in the incubating solution), succinylcholine
(0.1 mu M to 10 nM), or both sensitivities were defined as the concentratio
n inducing more than 10% of the maximum tension obtained by application of
16 mu M Ca++ solution. The myofilament response to Ca++ was studied with an
d without halothane by observing the isometric tension of skinned masseter
fibers challenged with increasing concentrations of Ca++, Muscle fiber type
was determined by the difference in strontium-induced tension measurements
.
Results: A significant difference in halothane sensitivity was found betwee
n type 1 masseter fibers (0.6 +/- 0.2 vol%; mean +/- SD) versus type 1 (2.7
+/- 0.6 vol%) and type 2 vastus lateralis muscle (2.5 +/- 0.4 vol%), Succi
nylcholine did not induce Ca++ release by the sarcoplasmic reticulum. in th
e masseter muscle, 0.75 vol% halothane decreased the maximal activated tens
ion by 40% but did not change the Ca++ concentration that yields 50% of the
maximal tension.
Conclusions: The very low halothane threshold for Ca++ release from the mas
seter muscle usually could be counteracted by a direct negative inotropic e
ffect on contractile proteins. However, halothane may increase the sensitiv
ity of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca++ release to succinylcholine-induced d
epolarization, leading to an increase in masseter muscle tone.