Pharmacokinetic modeling of M6G formation after oral administration of morphine in healthy volunteers

Citation
J. Lotsch et al., Pharmacokinetic modeling of M6G formation after oral administration of morphine in healthy volunteers, ANESTHESIOL, 90(4), 1999, pp. 1026-1038
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANESTHESIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00033022 → ACNP
Volume
90
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1026 - 1038
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3022(199904)90:4<1026:PMOMFA>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Background: Morphine is metabolized to two major metabolites, morphine-3-gl ucuronide and morphine-G-glucuronide (M6G). Under the conditions of long-te rm oral morphine administration, the accumulation of M6G may contribute to the analgesic effects, but it may also cause respiratory depression. Methods: Five healthy male volunteers (ages 25-34 yr) received 90 mg MST (m orphine sulfate 5H(2)O sustained-released tablet, equivalent to 67.8 mg ora l morphine). Multiple plasma and urine samples were taken for as long as 14 and 36 h, respectively. Individual pharmacokinetics after intravenous admi nistration of morphine and M6G were available from a previous investigation . A new model that considers the M6G-plasma profile as a sum of the input f rom the first-pass metabolism of morphine and the input from systemically a vailable morphine was applied to the plasma concentration versus time curve s of M6G, The concentrations of M6G at the effect site after long-term morp hine administration were simulated, Results: The fraction of morphine absorbed from the gut was 82 +/- 14%. Of this, 42 +/- 8% passed through the Liver, resulting in an oral bioavailabil ity of morphine of 34 +/- 9%. Of the total amount of M6G, 71 +/- 7% was for med during the first-pass metabolism, and 29 +/- 7% was formed by metabolis m of systemic morphine. After 36 h, the amounts of M6G and morphine excrete d in the urine were 92 +/- 17% and 9 +/- 3%, respectively. Simulation of ef fect-site concentrations of M6G indicated that after multiple oral dosing o f morphine in patients with normal liver and renal function, M6G might reac h concentrations two times greater than that of morphine. Conclusions: M6G may contribute to the analgesic and side effects seen with long-term morphine treatment. The current model of morphine and M6G pharma cokinetics after oral administration of morphine may serve as a pharmacokin etic basis for experiments evaluating the analgesic contribution of M6G wit h long-term oral dosing of morphine.