We present a model of error-prone female choice on leks, and investigate th
e effects of different degrees of error on the distribution of mating succe
ss among males present at leks of different sizes. At higher levels of erro
r, the best male is predicted to gain a smaller share of matings, while low
-ranking males gain a larger share. Males who are of high rank but not the
most desirable on the lek do best at intermediate levels of error, since th
e top-ranked male does not then claim all the matings, but assessment is st
ill sufficiently accurate for females to discriminate between high-ranking
and low-ranking competitors. The effects of error are shown to be more pron
ounced on larger leks, due to smaller expected differences in mating value
between males of adjacent ranks. This interaction between lek size and erro
r suggests that observed negative relationships between lek size and mating
skew need not be attributed solely to intrasexual competition, as previous
ly suggested, but could also be a result of imperfect choice.