Objectives. King (1996) reported that a combination of emotional, organic a
nd neuropsychological measures taken at 7-10 days following mild and modera
te head injury may significantly help predict patients most likely to suffe
r persisting postconcussion symptoms (PCS) at three months post-injury. Thi
s study investigated a cross-validation sample (N = 57) to determine whethe
r the results would be replicated for the early prediction of longer-term s
ufferers (i.e. those with persisting symptoms at 6 months post-injury).
Design. Multiple regression analyses were used in which scores on the Hospi
tal Anxiety and Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale, Short Orientation
Memory and Concentration Test, Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionn
aire and Post-Traumatic Amnesia taken at 7-10 days post-injury were the ind
ependent measures. Scoring on the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questi
onnaire taken at 6 months post-injury was the dependent measure.
Methods. Sixty-six consecutive patients admitted to any trauma ward in Oxfo
rdshire with a mild or moderate head injury were recruited from a largescal
e randomized controlled sample. The assessment measures were administered a
t 7-10 days post-injury and the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Question
naire at 6 months post-injury. Nine patients were unable to be followed up,
leaving an active sample of 57.
Results. The cross-validation data confirmed that a similar combination of
measures to that found in the original study best predicted persisting PCS
but that the strength of prediction diminished for the longer term predicti
on (i.e. 6 months post-injury).
Conclusions. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Impact of Event Sca
le and Post-Traumatic Amnesia in combination are recommended as useful prog
nostic screening instruments for predicting persisting PCS, but great cauti
on is required if they are used to aid predictions beyond 3 months post-inj
ury.