Shells are usually used as structural elements in buildings. In Germany the
y showed remarkable resistance to the effects of bombing during World War I
I. About 1 decade later, the possibility of employing shells in foundation
engineering was explored. Surveys of the literature indicate that shell fou
ndations have been employed effectively in different parts of the world and
were proven to provide an overall economical alternative to the convention
al flat foundations. However, the geotechnical design of these footings rem
ained the same as for their respective flat ones. Accordingly, the advantag
es of shell geometry in foundation engineering has not yet been explored in
the design of these footings. The objective of the present study is to exa
mine the overall geotechnical behavior of three types of shell foundations
resting on sand under axial loading conditions, namely, triangular, conical
, and pyramidal shells. Furthermore, the resulting bearing capacities and s
ettlements will be compared with conventional strip, circular, and square f
lat foundations. The present paper presents an experimental study on nine f
oundation models tested on loose, medium, and dense sand states. The influe
nce of shell configuration and embedment depth on the ultimate bearing capa
city and settlement will be presented. The results of the present experimen
tal investigation have shown the admirable performance of shell foundations
with respect to ultimate bearing capacity and settlement characteristics.
Shell foundations provide higher resistance to lateral loading as compared
with flat ones, and thus they will perform better in earthquake regions.