Rs. Hogg et al., Improved survival among HIV-infected patients after initiation of triple-drug antiretroviral regimens, CAN MED A J, 160(5), 1999, pp. 659-665
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: The efficacy of triple-drug antiretroviral regimens in the trea
tment of patients infected with HIV has been established in several randomi
zed clinical trials. However, the effectiveness of these new regimens in pa
tient populations outside clinical trials remains unproven. This study comp
ares mortality and AIDS-free survival among HIV-infected patients in Britis
h Columbia who were treated with double- and triple-drug regimens.
Methods: The authors used a prospective, population-based cohort design to
study a population of HIV-positive men and women 18 years or older for whom
antiretroviral therapy was first prescribed between Oct. 1, 1994, and Dec.
31, 1996; all patients were from British Columbia. Rates of progression fr
om the initiation of antiretroviral therapy to death or to diagnosis of pri
mary AIDS were determined for patients who initially received an ERA-II reg
imen (2 nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs] includ
ing lamivudine or stavudine, or both) and for those who initially received
an ERA-III regimen (triple-drug regimen consisting of 2 NRTIs and a proteas
e inhibitor [indinavir, ritonavir or saquinavir] or a non-NRTI [nevirapine]
).
Results: A total of 500 men and women (312 receiving an ERA-II regimen and
188 an ERA-III regimen) were eligible. Patients in the ERA-III group surviv
ed significantly longer than those in the ERA-II group. As of Dec. 31, 1997
, 40 patients had died (35 in the ERA-II group and 5 in the ERA-III group),
for a crude mortality rate of 8.0%. The cumulative mortality rates at 12 m
onths were 7.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.9% to 8.9%) for patients in
the ERA-II group and 1.6% (95% CI 0.7% to 2.5%) for those in the ERA-III g
roup (log rank p = 0.003). The likelihood of death was more than 3 times hi
gher among patients in the ERA-II group (mortality risk ratio 3.82 [95% CI
1.48 to 9.84], p = 0.006). After adjustment for prophylaxis for Pneumocysti
s carinii pneumonia or Mycobacterium avium infection, AIDS diagnosis, CD4cell count, sex and age at initiation of therapy, the likelihood of death a
mong patients in the ERA-II group was 3.21 times higher (95% CI 1.24 to 8.3
0, p = 0.016) than in the ERA-III group. Cumulative rates of progression to
AIDS or death at 12 months were 9.6% (95% CI 7.7% to 11.5%) in the ERA-II
group and 3.3% (95% Cl 1.8% to 4.8%) in the ERA-III group (log rank p = 0.0
06). After adjustment for prognostic variables (prophylaxis for P. carinii
pneumonia or M. avium infection, CD4+ cell count, sex and age at initiation
of treatment), the likelihood of progression to AIDS or death at 12 months
among patients in the ERA-II group was 2.37 times higher (95% CI 1.04 to 5
.38, p = 0.040) than in the ERA-III group.
Interpretation: This population-based cohort study confirms that patients i
nitially treated with a triple-drug antiretroviral regimen comprising 2 NRT
Is plus a protease inhibitor or a non-NRTI have a lower risk of morbidity a
nd death than patients treated exclusively with 2 NRTIs.