Cost of treating to a modified European atherosclerosis society LDL-C target - Comparison of atorvastatin with fluvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin
Dg. Smith et al., Cost of treating to a modified European atherosclerosis society LDL-C target - Comparison of atorvastatin with fluvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin, CLIN DRUG I, 17(3), 1999, pp. 185-193
Objective: To compare the costs of treating hypercholesterolaemic patients
to a modified European Atherosclerosis Society low density lipoprotein chol
esterol (LDL-C) target using atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin and sim
vastatin.
Patients and Study Design: A total of 336 patients with hyperlipidaemia wit
h coronary heart disease (CHD) and/or peripheral vascular disease (PVD) wer
e enrolled in this randomised, 54-week, controlled trial. Therapy was initi
ated at recommended starting doses and titrated up in dose every 12 weeks u
ntil the LDL-C target was achieved. For patients not reaching LDL-C tar-get
at the highest recommended dose of each statin, cholestyramine was added.
Results: A significantly greater proportion of patients treated with atorva
statin achieved LDL-C target at any time during the study compared with pat
ients treated with fluvastatin or pravastatin (p < 0.001 for each compariso
n), but not simvastatin (p = 0.135). Patients treated with atorvastatin ach
ieved LDL-C target significantly faster (p < 0.005) at lower doses of study
drug and required significantly fewer clinic visits than comparator statin
s. Consequently, mean total cost of care to reach LDL-C target was signific
antly lower with atorvastatin than with the other statins (p < 0.05; pound
501 versus pound 1130 for fluvastatin, pound 906 for pravastatin and pound
613 for simvastatin; pound, 1997).
Conclusions: In patients with CHD and/or PVD, LDL-C target is achieved fast
er using fewer resources and at a significant cost saving with atorvastatin
compared with fluvastatin, pravastatin or simvastatin.