J. Van Dijk et al., Differences in the ionic interaction of actin with the motor domains of nonmuscle and muscle myosin II, EUR J BIOCH, 260(3), 1999, pp. 672-683
Changes in the actin-myosin interface are thought to play an important role
in microfilament-linked cellular movements. In this study, we compared the
actin binding properties of the motor domain of Dictyostelium discoideum (
M765) and rabbit skeletal muscle myosin subfragment-1 (S1). The Dictyosteli
um motor domain resembles S1(A2) (S1 carrying the A2 light chain) in its in
teraction with G-actin. Similar to S1(A2), none of the Dictyostelium motor
domain constructs induced G-actin polymerization. The affinity of monomeric
actin (G-actin) was 20-fold lower far M765 than for S1(A2) but increasing
the number of positive charges in the loop 2 region of the D. discoideum mo
tor domain (residues 613-623) resulted in equivalent affinities of G-actin
for M765 and for S1. Proteolytic cleavage and cross-linking approaches were
used to show that M765, like S1, interacts via the loop 2 region with fila
mentous actin (F-actin). For both types of myosin, F-actin prevents trypsin
cleavage in the loop 2 region and F-actin segment 1-28 can be cross-linked
to loop 2 residues by a carbodiimide-induced reaction. In contrast with th
e S1, loop residues 559-565 of D. discoideum myosin was not cross-linked to
F-actin, probably due to the lower number of positive charges. These resul
ts confirm the importance of the loop 2 region of myosin for the interactio
n with both G-actin and F-actin, regardless of the source of myosin. The di
fferences observed in the way in which M765 and S1 interact with actin may
be linked to more general differences in the structure of the actomyosin in
terface of muscle and nonmuscle myosins.