Ac. Braud et al., Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in young breast cancer patients: Correlation between response and relapse?, EUR J CANC, 35(3), 1999, pp. 392-397
The aim, of this analysis was to assess how the clinical response to chemot
herapy corresponded to long-term prognosis in patients of less than 35 year
s of age. A retrospective analysis was made of response and survival data o
f 609 premenopausal patients who had been treated by four cycles of neoadju
vant chemotherapy followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy. Patients were st
ratified into three age groups (group 1, less than or equal to 35 years; gr
oup 2, 35-40 years; group 3, greater than or equal to 41 years). Objective
and complete clinical response rates were significantly higher in the young
est patients (below 35 yrs: P = 0.005 and P=0.001, respectively) in stark c
ontrast to a particularly poor outcome of this subpopulation. Five-year loc
al recurrence rates were 31% in the youngest patients, compared with 26% an
d 16% in groups 2 and 3, respectively (P = 0.0007). Group 1 patients also h
ad significantly higher 5-year metastatic relapse rates (41% versus 35% and
28%; P = 0.007) and 5-year survival figures were 70%, 82% and 84% for grou
ps 1, 2 and 3 respectively (P=0.002). Finally, stratification by age and by
response revealed that, whilst the outcome of the youngest patients was hi
ghly dependent on their response to primary chemotherapy, complete responde
rs showed disease-free survival rates at 5 years that were lower than these
of older patients, whatever their response. Despite a seemingly better con
trol of the primary tumour by chemotherapy, the patients in the youngest ag
e group remained at a high risk for local and metastatic relapse. This appa
rent paradox may be in part attributable to rapid disease progression of mi
crometastatic tumour subpopulations that are refractory to chemotherapy. (C
) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.