EMISSIONS FROM HYDROELECTRIC RESERVOIRS AND COMPARISON OF HYDROELECTRICITY, NATURAL-GAS AND OIL

Citation
L. Gagnon et A. Chamberland, EMISSIONS FROM HYDROELECTRIC RESERVOIRS AND COMPARISON OF HYDROELECTRICITY, NATURAL-GAS AND OIL, Ambio, 22(8), 1993, pp. 568-569
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences","Engineering, Environmental
Journal title
AmbioACNP
ISSN journal
00447447
Volume
22
Issue
8
Year of publication
1993
Pages
568 - 569
Database
ISI
SICI code
0044-7447(1993)22:8<568:EFHRAC>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
When reservoirs are created, a small fraction of the flooded organic m atter decomposes into humic acids, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) , nitrogen, phosphorus, and other elements. The major greenhouse gases produced are CO2 and CH4. For northern projects, Canadian studies on emissions from hydroelectric reservoirs have reached similar conclusio ns: Emissions, including methane, are less than 35 kg CO2 equivalent p er MWh. Using a typical project in northern Quebec as the basis for an alysis, none of the studies dispute the considerable advantages of hyd roelectricity regarding greenhouse-gas emissions. Taking into account all components of energy systems, emissions of greenhouse gases from n atural-gas power plants are 24 to 26 times greater-than emissions from hydroelectric plants. The Freshwater Institute, in the article publis hed in Ambio suggests that emissions from hydroelectric plants could b e a significant source of greenhouse gases (1). This conclusion does n ot apply to most hydroelectric projects for two reasons: First, the Fr eshwater Institute's studies concerned flooded peatlands and shallow r eservoirs that are not typical of most hydro projects; and second, the Institute analyzed a hydro project with a ratio of flooded area to en ergy production that is 6 to 10 times higher than typical projects in Canada.