Endometrial pinopodes indicate a shift in the window of receptivity in IVFcycles

Citation
G. Nikas et al., Endometrial pinopodes indicate a shift in the window of receptivity in IVFcycles, HUM REPR, 14(3), 1999, pp. 787-792
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
HUMAN REPRODUCTION
ISSN journal
02681161 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
787 - 792
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-1161(199903)14:3<787:EPIASI>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
The formation of endometrial pinopodes detected by scanning electron micros copy may be a specific marker for uterine receptivity, Aiming to assess the effects of ovarian stimulation on pinopode formation, we examined sequenti al endometrial biopsies from 17 oocyte donors. Seven normally menstruating women served as controls, Up to four samples were taken from each woman at 24-72 h intervals between days 14 and 24, giving a total of 69 samples, The day of oocyte retrieval was designated day 14 in ovarian stimulation cycle s and the day of luteinizing hormone surge was designated day 13 in natural cycles. Endometrial morphology and pinopode numbers were similar in both g roups. Fully developed pinopodes appeared in only one sample per cycle, ind icating their short life span, However, the cycle day these structures appe ared varied up to 5 days between women and the distribution was as follows: day 18 (n = 2), day 19 (n = 7), day 20 (n = 4), day 21 (n = 3), day 22 (n = 1) in ovarian stimulation cycles, and day 20 (n = 2), day 21 (n = 2), day 22 (n = 3) in natural cycles. Furthermore, accelerated pinopode formation in ovarian stimulation cycles was positively correlated with day 13 progest erone, Our findings show that ovarian stimulation does not affect endometri al pinopode formation in terms of quantity and life span. The cycle days wh en pinopodes form are specific to the individual, being on average 1-2 days earlier in ovarian stimulation than in natural cycles, These changes in pi nopode expression may reflect shifts in the window of receptivity, resultin g in ovo-endometrial asynchrony and limiting implantation success in in-vit ro fertilization.