Scintigraphy for evaluating early aspiration after oral feeding in patients receiving prolonged ventilation via tracheostomy

Citation
B. Schonhofer et al., Scintigraphy for evaluating early aspiration after oral feeding in patients receiving prolonged ventilation via tracheostomy, INTEN CAR M, 25(3), 1999, pp. 311-314
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
03424642 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
311 - 314
Database
ISI
SICI code
0342-4642(199903)25:3<311:SFEEAA>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Objective: In tracheotomised patients the incidence of aspiration is diffic ult to determine because investigators often apply different criteria. In t his study a scintigraphic method was used to visualise feeding aspiration d irectly and the results were compared with clinical evidence of aspiration. Design: Prospective study in difficult-to-wean patients with tracheostomy. Setting: Respiratory ICU. Patients and methods: The study population consisted of 62 consecutive pati ents (16 females, age: 64.1 +/- 11.1 years). All patients were tracheotomis ed and had previously been long-term ventilated in other ICUs due to weanin g failure. The scintigraphic test was performed during spontaneous breathin g. The standard nutrition consisted of a liquid, semi-liquid and solid meal which was labelled with 100 MBq 99mTc-human serum albumin. Measurements and results: Scintigraphic aspiration (SA) was defined as posi tive if radioactivity was detected in the bronchial system using a scintill ation camera. Furthermore, aspiration was proven clinically (CA). CA and SA yielded identical results in 54 of the 62 patients [10 positive (16%) and in 44 negative (71 %)]. CA, but not SA, was seen in 4/62 (6.5 %) and SA, bu t: not CA, was found in 4/62 (6.5 %) patients. Conclusions: Our data re-emp hasise that aspiration in tracheotomised patients is common (in our study a pproximately 30 %). The scintigraphic method failed to identify all tracheo tomised patients with clinically significant aspiration; however, it did su ggest that some patients had subclinical aspiration.