Conclusion: The clinical significance of intrapancreatic accessory spleens
resides in the mimicry of pancreatic cancer. Radionuclide tests (Octreotide
scan and Tc99m sulfur colloid scan) should be undertaken to distinguish th
ese lesions from neuroendocrine tumors, hypervascular metastases and pancre
atic carcinoma. If the tests are equivocal, diagnostic laparotomy or laparo
scopy is recommended.
Background: Despite its relatively common occurrence, intrapancreatic ectop
ic splenic tissue is rarely detected owing to its asymptomatic nature.
Methods: We report a case of a clinically asymptomatic patient in which abd
ominal computed tomography (CT) scans revealed a mass of 1.5 cm in diameter
in the distal pancreas. The tumor markers CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic ant
igen (CEA) were slightly elevated, and pancreatic neoplasm was suspected.
Results: Left pancreatic resection and splenectomy were performed. The remo
ved specimen disclosed the presence of an accessory spleen within the pancr
eatic tail.