A social preference for proportional (or simply increased) participation of
minorities in labor markets implies a transition from a regime of segregat
ion (intentional or not) to one of proportional (or increased) participatio
n. In this paper we examine this transition in a formal model of a minority
, an employer and an educator. We use the implications of our model to appr
aise the legal responses to unintentional discrimination, using examples pr
imarily from gender discrimination. The law is found to inhibit this transi
tion, to prevent operation of its own provisions favoring minorities in cas
es of past discrimination, to ignore means other than the elimination of st
ructural discrimination for increasing minority participation, to prevent c
oordination of educators and employers that could further policy goals, and
to prevent agreements that would provide the public good of integration. (
C) 1999 by Elsevier Science Inc.