PURPOSE. To examine the processes involved in formation of protein deposits
on hydrogel contact lenses.
METHODS. The adsorption and/or penetration of lysozyme on or into three typ
es of contact lenses, etafilcon A, vifilcon A, and tefilcon, were investiga
ted in vitro using a radiolabel-tracer technique, x-ray photoelectron spect
roscopy, and laser scanning confocal microscopy.
RESULTS. Binding of lysozyme to high-water-content ionic contact lenses (et
afilcon A and vifilcon A) was dominated by a penetration process. The exten
t of this penetration was a function of charge density of the lenses, so th
at there was a higher degree of penetration of lysozyme in etafilcon A than
in vifilcon A lenses. In contrast, the binding of lysozyme to tefilcon len
ses was a surface adsorption process. The adsorption and desorption kinetic
s showed similar trends to those found in human serum albumin (HSA) adsorpt
ion on lens surfaces. However, the extent of lysozyme adsorption on tefilco
n is much higher than HSA adsorption, probably because of the self-associat
ion of lysozyme on the tefilcon lens surface. Furthermore, either penetrati
on or adsorption of lysozyme involved reversible and irreversible processes
and were both time dependent.
CONCLUSIONS. Binding of lysozyme to hydrogel lenses involves surface adsorp
tion or matrix penetration. These processes may be reversible or irreversib
le. The properties of the lens materials, such as charge density (ionicity)
and porosity (water content) of the lenses, determine the type and rates o
f these processes.