Does EMDR work? And if so, why?: A critical review of controlled outcome and dismantling research

Citation
Sp. Cahill et al., Does EMDR work? And if so, why?: A critical review of controlled outcome and dismantling research, J ANXIETY D, 13(1-2), 1999, pp. 5-33
Citations number
69
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS
ISSN journal
08876185 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
5 - 33
Database
ISI
SICI code
0887-6185(199901/04)13:1-2<5:DEWAIS>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Research on Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing therapy (EMDR) wa s reviewed to answer the questions "Does EMDR work?" and "If so, Why?" This first question was further subdivided on the basis of the control group: ( a) no-treatment (or wait list control), (b) nonvalidated treatments, and (c ) other validated treatments. The evidence supports the following general c onclusions: First, EMDR appears to be effective in reducing at least some i ndices of distress relative to no-treatment in a number of anxiety conditio ns, including posttraumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, and public-spe aking anxiety. Second, EMDR appears at least as effective or more effective than several nonvalidated treatments (e.g., relaxation, active listening) for posttraumatic stress reactions. Third, despite statements implying the contrary,no previously published study has directly compared EMDR with an i ndependently validated treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (e.g., t herapist-directed flooding). In the treatment of simple phobia, participant modeling has been found to be more effective than EMDR. Fourth, our review of dismantling studies reveals there is no convincing evidence that eye mo vements significantly contribute to treatment outcome. Recommendations rega rding further research directions are provided. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science L td. All rights reserved.