The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a new double g
love hole detection system in the Emergency Department. First, the frequenc
y of holes in both gloves of the double glove hole detection system was det
ermined using a watertight test method. Second, the frequency of glove punc
ture was determined first by searching for the optical color change that oc
curs with the ingress of fluid in the double glove hole detection system. T
hese same gloves were then removed and also checked for holes by the watert
ight test method, After removal from the package, no holes were detected in
the two gloves of the system using the watertight test method. In 50 conse
cutive patients, there was no color change in the inner glove indicating gl
ove puncture. When these same gloves were then tested with the watertight t
est method, 14 of the 50 double glove hole detection systems failed; all 14
outer gloves were punctured, and three of the inner gloves had holes witho
ut demonstrable injury to the skin, This double glove hole detection system
is not a reliable system to detect holes in relatively dry clinical settin
gs because the ingress of fluid by capillary action between the gloves is n
ecessary to cause a color change in the inner glove that signals the presen
ce of a hole. (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.