We conducted a randomized double-blind trial to evaluate the effect of intr
aoperative wound infiltration with bupivacaine 0.25% (1 ml/kg) compared to
placebo (NaCl 0.9% 1 ml/kg) in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Fi
fty-two patients were entered in the trial and 50 completed it. Two methods
of wound infiltration were assessed: (a) infiltration after partial wound
closure and (b) infiltration prior to wound closure. Postoperatively patien
ts received morphine sulfate on demand. Visual analog pain scores were reco
rded every 2 h for 12 h after the operation. Analgesia requirements were re
corded over the duration of the study for each patient. The patients who re
ceived bupivacaine infiltration prior to wound closure had significantly re
duced pain scores in the recovery room and used significantly less morphine
in the first 2 h following the procedure. They also had reduced pain score
s and reduced morphine demand in the first 10 h but this did not reach stat
istical significance. No difference was noted between the placebo group ana
l those receiving infiltration after partial wound closure. It is concluded
that infiltration of bupivacaine is a simple and safe aid in obtaining ana
lgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery provided that it is infi
ltrated prior to wound closure.