C. Hudis et al., 5-year results of dose-intensive sequential adjuvant chemotherapy for women with high-risk node-positive breast cancer: A phase II study, J CL ONCOL, 17(4), 1999, pp. 1118-1126
Purpose: We conducted a phase II pilot study of dose-intensive adjuvant che
motherapy with doxorubicin followed sequentially by high-dose cyclophospham
ide to determine the safety and feasibility of this dose-dense treatment an
d to estimate the disease-free and overall survival in breast cancer patien
ts with four or more involved axillary lymph nodes.
patients and Methods: Seventy-three patients received adjuvant treatment wi
th four cycles of doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus every 21 d
ays, followed by three cycles of cyclophosphamide 3,000 mg/m(2) every 14 da
ys with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support.
Results: Seventy one patients were assessable, and all but two completed al
l planned chemotherapy. There was no treatment-related mortality. The most
common toxicity was neutropenic fever, which occurred in 39% of patients. M
edian disease-free survival is 66 months (95% confidence interval, 34 to 98
months), and median overall survival has not yet been reached. At 5 years
of follow-up, the disease-free survival is 51.7%, and over-all survival is
60.0%. There is no long-term treatment-related toxicity, and no cases of ac
ute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome have been observed.
Conclusion: Our pilot study of doxorubicin followed by cyclophosphamide dem
onstrates the safety and feasibility of the sequential dose dense plan. Lon
g-term follow-up, although noncomparative, is promising. However, this regi
men is associated with a higher incidence of toxicity (and also higher cost
s) than the standard dose and schedule of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide,
and therefore it should not be used as conventional therapy in the absence
of demonstrated improvement of outcome. Randomized trials testing the dose
dense approach have been completed but not yet reported. Because the seque
ntial plan can decrease overlapping toxicities, it is an appropriate platfo
rm for the addition of newer active agents, such as taxanes or monoclonal a
ntibodies. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.