The clinical judgment literature suggests that clinicians are biased to see
psychopathology. The social cognition literature shows that people can be
biased to search for information relevant only to the hypothesis under test
and to ignore information relevant to the alternative. In light of these b
iases. we asked practicing clinicians (N = 106 respondents) in three condit
ions to read 1 of 9 biographical essays. The conditions called for the clin
icians to judge the writer of the essay as (a) psychologically healthy or n
ot, (b) psychologically healthy or unhealthy, or (c) experiencing psychopat
hology or not. The latter condition was expected to produce the highest fre
quency of negative:judgments. The opposite result was obtained. To determin
e ii this was due to the extreme wording in the "psychopathology" condition
, 30 additional practicing clinicians assessed whether the writer of the es
say was psychologically unhealthy or not. A comparison of these data with t
hose from the two less extreme conditions showed no bias. The results were
interpreted as an appropriate level of conservativism in clinical judgment
with respect to the extreme diagnosis implied by the term psychopathology.
(C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.