Clinical results of the transurethral resection and evaluation of superficial bladder carcinomas by means of fluorescence diagnosis after intravesical instillation of 5-aminolevulinic acid

Citation
T. Filbeck et al., Clinical results of the transurethral resection and evaluation of superficial bladder carcinomas by means of fluorescence diagnosis after intravesical instillation of 5-aminolevulinic acid, J ENDOUROL, 13(2), 1999, pp. 117-121
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
ISSN journal
08927790 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
117 - 121
Database
ISI
SICI code
0892-7790(199903)13:2<117:CROTTR>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Background and Objective: The high recurrence rate of superficial bladder c arcinomas requires new approaches in diagnosis and therapy. Particularly, a n improvement in detection, resulting in better resection of flat lesions, which are poorly or not detectable under white light, is necessary. The eff ectiveness of fluorescence diagnosis for detection and transurethral resect ion of bladder carcinomas was investigated in a prospective study. Materials and Methods: From 120 patients, 347 biopsies were taken or tumors resected with the aid of fluorescence from 5-aminolevulinic acid, Urotheli al carcinomas and dysplasias were detected in 124 cases. Results: Of the lesions, 119 were fluorescence positive (N = 74 pTaG1/2; N = 9 pT1G1/2; N = 11 pT1G3; N = 7 carcinoma in situ; N = 6 p > T1; N = 12 dy splasia II), and 5 were falsely negative (N = 3 pTaG1/2; N = 1 pT1G1/2; N = 1 dysplasia II). The sensitivity of the fluorescence diagnosis (96.0%) was significantly higher than the 67.5% sensitivity of white-light cystoscopy (P < 0.0001). Taking the data for primary or recurrent tumor resection and secondary resection separately, the sensitivity was 100% and 80%, respectiv ely, and was significantly higher than that of white-light cystoscopy, whic h was 80.8% and 20%, respectively (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0008). The lower se nsitivity of fluorescence diagnosis in secondary transurethral resection is attributed to the higher rate of false-negative findings in areas of forme r resection. Conclusions: The high rate of false-positive findings limits the correct in terpretation of fluorescence findings. In spite of this, fluorescence diagn osis is superior to white-light cystoscopy in every case. By means of bette r detection of urothelial neoplasias and dysplasias, as well as more thorou gh and extensive resection under fluorescence control, it should be possibl e to reduce the recurrence rate of superficial bladder carcinomas.