Ee. Small et al., Regional climate model simulation of precipitation in central Asia: Mean and interannual variability, J GEO RES-A, 104(D6), 1999, pp. 6563-6582
We examine how well the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) reg
ional climate model (RegCM2) simulates the mean and interannual variability
of precipitation in a semiarid region to more fully establish the strength
s and weaknesses of the model as a tool for studying regional scale climate
processes, We compare precipitation observations with RegCM2 output from a
5.5 year long simulation of the climate of central Asia, driven by the Eur
opean Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts analyses. RegCM2 simulates
well the spatial patterns and annual cycles of precipitation observed in cl
imatically different subregions. The magnitude of simulated precipitation i
s similar to observations except over the driest part of Central Asia where
the simulated precipitation is too high. We calculate precipitation anomal
ies for each month as the difference between the monthly total and the 5 ye
ar average for that month, from both observations and RegCM2 output. The ma
gnitude of simulated interannual variability is similar to observations, al
though there are differences. RegCM2 tends to underpredict (overpredict) th
e magnitude of variability in the same combinations of subregion and season
for which it underpredicts (overpredicts) mean precipitation. RegCM2 close
ly reproduces precipitation anomalies observed in specific months, except d
uring summer and during winter in the mountains. There is no correlation be
tween model biases in mean precipitation and how well the model reproduces
a series of precipitation anomalies, This suggests that the processes contr
olling the mean and the variability of precipitation differ. Therefore eval
uating the ability of a regional climate model to simulate both quantities
is a demanding test of model performance.