Systemic reactions due to allergen immunotherapy

Citation
M. Karaayvaz et al., Systemic reactions due to allergen immunotherapy, J INVES ALL, 9(1), 1999, pp. 39-44
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease
Journal title
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY & CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
ISSN journal
10189068 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
39 - 44
Database
ISI
SICI code
1018-9068(199901/02)9:1<39:SRDTAI>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, type and potential risk factors of systemic reactions due to conventional allergen immunother apy with aqueous extracts. The study was carried out retrospectively and in cluded 1,506 patients to whom allergy injections had been given during the last 12 years. Symptoms in each reaction were classified with respect to ti me of onset, involvement of respiratory tract or skin, and presence of hypo tension. The results showed 125 systemic reactions in 109 patients (1 per 1 ,831 injections), of which 52.8% were of the skin, 12% were respiratory sym ptoms, 30.4% respiratory symptoms and skin, 0.8% hypertension only, and 4% hypotension with respiratory symptoms and skin reactions. Most of the syste mic reactions (84.8%) occurred within the 30 min after injection. Forty-one per cent of the systemic reactions were observed in the build-up period (1 /52 patients, 1/1, 158 injections) and 58.4% in the maintenance injection p eriod (1/73 patients, 1/2,311 injections). Seventy-six systemic reactions w ere related to pollen season (60.8%), 11 were related to injection from a n ew vial (8.8%) and eight to both pollen season and a new vial (6.4%). Thirt y-five per cent of the patients who experienced systemic reactions had bron chial asthma, but there was no correlation between frequency of the two. Th ere was also no correlation between systemic reactions and age or sex. It w as concluded that immunotherapy has a low rate of systemic reactions and th at maintenance immunotherapy appears to be associated with fewer such react ions than the build-up period. The 30 min waiting period is adequate for co nventional immunotherapy. However, a longer waiting period may be necessary for high-risk subjects.