Computer-based technology is often credited with making decentralized decis
ion-making possible, helping firms to respond rapidly to changing marker co
nditions. Research on this subject, however, shows contradictory effects: s
ome studies support decentralization and others support centralization. Thi
s longitudinal study examines how one form of computer-based technology, pr
ogrammable automation (PA), affects centralization. Unlike previous studies
, it attempts to clear up some of the confusion surrounding technology's ef
fect on centralization by distinguishing between strategic and operating de
cisions, and between decision-making authority and influence. As expected,
PA flattened the hierarchy. It had no effect on strategic decision-making p
ower, but surprisingly, did influence centralized line-operating authority
and influence. This finding is particularly striking because firms with dec
entralized line-operating decision-making are more likely to adopt PA.