The crystal structure of Escherichia coli class II fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase in complex with phosphoglycolohydroxamate reveals details of mechanism and specificity
Dr. Hall et al., The crystal structure of Escherichia coli class II fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase in complex with phosphoglycolohydroxamate reveals details of mechanism and specificity, J MOL BIOL, 287(2), 1999, pp. 383-394
The structure of a class II fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase in complex w
ith the substrate analogue and inhibitor phosphoglycolohydroxamate (PGH) ha
s been determined using X-ray diffraction terms to a resolution of 2.0 Angs
trom (1 Angstrom = 0.1 nm). The crystals are trigonal, space group P3(1)21
with a = b = 78.24 Angstrom, c = 289.69 Angstrom. The asymmetric unit is a
homodimer of (alpha/beta)(8) barrels and the model has refined to give R-wo
rk 19.2%, R-free (based on 5% of the data) 23.0%. PGH resembles the ene-dio
late transition state of the physiological substrate dihydroxyacetone phosp
hate. It is well ordered and bound in a deep polar cavity at the C-terminal
end of the (alpha/beta)(8) barrel, where it chelates the catalytic zinc io
n using hydroxyl and enolate oxygen atoms. Trigonal bipyramidal coordinatio
n of the zinc ion is completed by three histidine residues. The complex net
work of hydrogen bonds at the catalytic centre is required to organise the
position of key functional groups and metal ion ligands. A well-defined mon
ovalent cation-binding site is observed following significant re-organisati
on of loop structures. This assists the formation of a phosphate-binding si
te on one side of the barrel that tethers PGH in the catalytic site. The po
sitions of functional groups of substrate and putative interactions with ke
y amino acid residues are identified. Knowledge of the complex structure co
mplements the results of spectroscopic and site-directed mutagenesis studie
s, and contributes to our understanding of the mechanism and substrate spec
ificity of this family of enzymes. A reaction mechanism distinct from that
proposed for other class II aldolases is discussed. The results suggest tha
t the class II aldolases should be sub-divided into two groups on the basis
of both distinct folds and mechanism. (C) 1999 Academic Press.