S. Etebar et Dw. Cahill, Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability, J NEUROSURG, 90(4), 1999, pp. 163-169
Object. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 125 consecutive p
atients in whom instrumentation was placed to promote lumbar fusion for the
treatment of degenerative instability. All procedures were performed by a
single surgeon. The authors sought to determine the risk factors for next-s
egment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion with rigid instrumentation.
Methods. Thirty-one of 125 fusion procedures were performed in women who we
re postmenopausal. A total of 18 of 125 patients developed symptomatic next
-segment degeneration at a previously asymptomatic level; 15 were postmenop
ausal women. Data were obtained in patients with next-segment failure based
on radiographic studies, neurological assessment, demographic factors, and
sequential follow-up examinations. The mean follow-up period for this grou
p was 44.8 months. All women were postmenopausal, and 53% received biphosph
onate drugs and calcium supplementation preoperatively for osteopenia. Twen
ty percent of all patients with next-segment failure were cigarette smokers
. Next-segment diseases included spondylolisthesis (39%), spinal canal sten
osis due to disc herniation and/or facet hypertrophy (33%), stress fracture
of the adjacent vertebral body (28%), and scoliosis (17%). Patients freque
ntly had more than one degenerative process at the next segment.
Conclusions. The risk of adjacent-segment failure is clearly higher for pat
ients in whom lumbar fusion with rigid instrumentation is performed to trea
t degenerative instability. This risk appears to be especially high in post
menopausal women.