Development and subsequent refinement of the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire: A quality-of-life instrument for adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Authors
Citation
Ej. Irvine, Development and subsequent refinement of the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire: A quality-of-life instrument for adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease, J PED GASTR, 28(4), 1999, pp. S23-S27
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION
ISSN journal
02772116 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
S23 - S27
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-2116(199904)28:4<S23:DASROT>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) describes the physical, social, and emotional attitudes and behavior of people in relation to healt h status. By the 1980s, HRQOL was noted to be impaired in chronic diseases but inflammatory bowel disease, had not been extensively described. Methods: This review summarizes the results of several studies describing t he development and application of a disease-specific HRQOL instrument, the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ). Results: An initial study described how patients with inflammatory bowel di sease identified 150 problems they had experienced in four domains: bowel, systemic, emotional, and social function. Almost half of patients underrepo rted impairment until encouraged by a reminder list. Thirty-two questions w ere included in the final questionnaire and were scored on a 7-point scale from 1 (worst) to 7 (best) for a range of possible scores from 32 to 224. P hysicians' and spouses' global assessments correlated poorly with patient-r eported HRQOL. Subsequent validation of the IBDQ suggested a strong correla tion with disease severity (r = -0.5; p < 0.001) and a test-retest reliabil ity of 0.7. Mean score changes of 16 to 30 points have been linked to chang es in therapy. Statistically significant differences also occur between act ive and inactive disease. Results of four clinical trials have included the IBDQ as a measure of outcome. A self-administered version and a shortened version of the IBDQ have also been validated. Conclusions: The IBDQ is a valid, reliable, and sensitive measure that can be meaningfully applied in clinical trials. The short IBDQ may also be usef ul in clinical research and office practice.