Al. Van Steveninck et al., The sensitivity of pharmacodynamic tests for the central nervous system effects of drugs on the effects of sleep deprivation, J PSYCHOPH, 13(1), 1999, pp. 10-17
Various methods are used to quantify sedative drug effects, but it is unkno
wn how these surrogate measures relate to clinically relevant sleepiness. T
his study assessed the sensivity of different surrogates of sedation to cli
nically relevant sleepiness induced by sleep deprivation. Nine healthy volu
nteers completed a balanced three-way cross-over study with I-week wash-out
periods. Adaptive tracking, smooth-pursuit and saccadic eye movements, bod
y sway, digit symbol substitution (DSST), visual analogue scales (VAS) and
electroencephalograms (EEG) were evaluated on three occasions: (1) during t
he day after normal sleep, (2) during wakefulness at night; and (3) during
the day after a night of sleep deprivation. VAS of alertness showed a gradu
al decline at night and a constant average reduction of 38 percent [95% Con
fidence intervals (CI), 28-47%] during the day after sleep deprivation. Ave
rage mood scores diminished by 14 percent (95%, Cl 2-24%) during the day af
ter sleep deprivation. Adaptive tracking saccadic eye movements and body sw
ay tended to deteriorate at night, but overall this was not statistically s
ignificant. After a night of sleep deprivation, adaptive tracking decreased
by 21 percent (95% CI, 11-30%), saccadic eye movements decreased by 9-10 p
ercent (95% CI, 5-13%/6-15%) and body sway increased by 37 percent (95% CI,
5-79%). In contrast, EEG beta(2)-amplitudes declined significantly at nigh
t by 18 percent (95% CI, 6-29%), without changes during the day after sleep
deprivation. Smooth pursuit, DSST and other EEC-amplitudes remained unchan
ged. These results emphasize that reductions in adaptive tracking, saccadic
peak velocity and body sway caused by sedative drugs really reflect sedati
on. They also provide a level of clinical significance for these surrogates
of sedation. EEG: parameters and smooth pursuit were unaffected by sleep d
eprivation, so drug-induced changes in these measures may not reflect sedat
ion in a stricter sense. The motivation and alertness necessary for DSST ma
y overcome mild sedation.