Do social factors affect where patients die: an analysis of 10 years of cancer deaths in England

Citation
Ij. Higginson et al., Do social factors affect where patients die: an analysis of 10 years of cancer deaths in England, J PUBL H M, 21(1), 1999, pp. 22-28
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE
ISSN journal
09574832 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
22 - 28
Database
ISI
SICI code
0957-4832(199903)21:1<22:DSFAWP>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Background This study investigated whether indices of social deprivation we re related to the proportion of cancer patients who died at home. Methods Data were derived from death registrations for all cancer deaths 19 85-1994 in England. Two indices of deprivation (Underprivileged Area Score (UPA), or Jarman, and Townsend scores) were calculated for each electoral w ard; 1991 Census data were used. The scores use combinations of variables, including the percentage in overcrowded homes, the percentage of elderly pe ople living alone, the percentage of one-parent families, etc. A high score indicates more deprivation. The main outcome measures were the proportion (in five and ten year averages) of cancer deaths which occurred at home, ca lculated for every electoral ward (with populations usually ranging from 50 00 to 11000). Spearman rho was used to test for correlations between the pr oportion of cancer deaths at home and deprivation score. Electoral wards we re categorized by deprivation score into three groups of equal size and ana lysed over 10 years. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the relati ve association of different patient based and electoral ward variables with cancer death at home. p < 0.05 (two-tailed) was taken as significant. Results There were over 1.3 million death registrations from cancer in the 10 years. The proportion who died at home was 0.27, in hospital 0.47, and o ther setting 0.26. There were wide variations (0.05-0.75) in the proportion of people who died at home in different electoral wards. Small inverse cor relations were found between the percentage who died at home and the UPA (- 0.35; p < 0.001) and Townsend (-0.26; p < 0.001) scores. The correlations w ere greatest in North Thames (-0.63, UPA) and smallest in West Midlands (-0 .20, UPA). The proportion of home deaths for the different bands of depriva tion were: 0.30 (low deprivation), 0.27 (middle deprivation) and 0.24 (high deprivation). Plotting the trends over 10 years suggests no change in this relationship. Multiple regression analysis predicted several ward and pati ent characteristics and accounted for 30 per cent of the variation. Increas ed age (patient variable), Jarman score and ethnic minorities (both ward va riables) were associated with fewer patients dying at home. Being male and having cancer of the digestive organs were associated with home death. Conclusion There are wide variations in the percentage of cancer deaths at home in different electoral wards. Social factors are inversely correlated with home cancer death, and may explain part of this variation. Home care i n deprived areas may be especially difficult to achieve.