Pi. Lee et al., Minilaparoscopy to reduce complications from cannula insertion in patientswith previous pelvic or abdominal surgery, J AM AS G L, 6(1), 1999, pp. 91-95
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS
Study Objective. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of minilaparoscopy for
visualization and adhesiolysis of intraabdominal adhesions for sale insert
ion of a primary umbilical cannula in patients who had previous pelvic or a
bdominal surgery
Design, Prospective, observational study (Canadian Task Force classificatio
n II-I).
Setting. University-affiliated hospital.
Patients. Twenty women who had previous pelvic or abdominal surgery, exclud
ing tubal ligation and simple appendectomy.
Intervention. Minilaparoscopy was carried for visualization and adhesiolysi
s at the entry site before insertion of an umbilical cannula.
Measurements and Results. Eleven patients had Pfannenstiel scars and nine h
ad vertical midline scars from previous surgeries (4 total abdominal hyster
ectomies, 13 adnexal surgery, cesarean sections, 3 ectopic pregnancies, 1 r
uptured appendix, 1 unknown Dowel surgery). Thirteen women (65%) had had on
e previous surgery, five (25%) had had two, and two (10%) had had three. Ni
ne patients (45%) had significant adhesions of omentum or intestine that re
quired adhesiolysis. Mean operating time for minilaparoscopy was 5 minutes
for 7 1 women who had no or minimal adhesions that did not interfere with s
afe insertion of the umbilical cannula and effective use of a 10-mm telesco
pe, and 25 minutes in 9 patients who required adhesiolysis before insertion
of the umbilical cannula because of dense adhesions of omentum or intestin
e at the entry site. No complications with minilaparoscopy occurred.
Conclusion. Minilaparoscopy can be performed safely and effectively to redu
ce serious vascular or visceral injury from insertion of primary cannula in
patients who had previous pelvic and/or abdominal surgery. However, conclu
sions cannot be derived from this study due to the small number of subjects
. Further study is necessary in a larger patient population to evaluate eff
icacy, safety and advantages of minilaparoscopy over of her techniques.