Randomised unicenter trial for comparison of three regimens in de novo adult acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia

Citation
M. Beksac et al., Randomised unicenter trial for comparison of three regimens in de novo adult acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia, MED ONCOL, 15(3), 1998, pp. 183-190
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
13570560 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
183 - 190
Database
ISI
SICI code
1357-0560(199809)15:3<183:RUTFCO>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Various regimens have been explored in the treatment of acute nonlymphoblas tic leukaemia (AML), but so far none has been shown to be superior. Here we report on a comparison of three widely used protocols defined by Berman (G roup 1), MRC AML 10 (Group 2), and Arlin (Group 3). Group 1 includes cytosi ne arabinoside (Ara-C) (100 mg/m(2)/d, days 1-7) and idarubicin (Ida) (12 m g/m(2)/d, days 1-3) for induction, and Ara-C (200 mg/m(2)/d, days 1-6) and Ida (15 mg/m(2)/d, day 1) twice for consolidation. Group 2 includes Ara-C ( 200 mg/m2/d, days 1-10), daunorubicin (Dnc) (50 mg/m(2)/d, days 1, 3, 5) an d etoposide (VP16) (100 mg/m(2)/d, days 1-5) for induction. The first conso lidation therapy consisted of the same schedule except for Ara-C given on d ays 1-8. The second consolidation regimen consisted of Ara-C (200 mg/m(2)/d , days 1-8),VP16(100 mg/m(2)/d, days 1-5) and amsacrine (100 mg/m2/d, days 1-5). Mitoxantrone (Mitox) (10 mg/m(2)/d, days 1-5) and Ara-C (200 mg/m(2)/ d, days 1-3) were given as the third consolidation therapy. Group 3 was ide ntical to Group 1 except for Ida being replaced with Miter. During the stud y period 99 patients were enrolled and 34 were allocated randomly to Group 1, 36 to Group 2, and 29 to Group 3. Except for age distribution all patien ts' characteristics were similar between the groups. As there were more eld erly patients in Group 1, time to complete remission (CR) was longer in thi s group as they needed more second induction. Induction deaths were 9.7%, 1 2.9% and 14.8% in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Patients in Group 2 rece ived a higher amount of Ara-C compared with the other groups (P < 0.001). A fter a median follow-up period of 45 months (1-67 for survivors) an advanta ge in Group 1 was observed. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was better in Group 1 (P = 0.014) at 3 years. Fourteen of the patients were transplanted (11 a llografts, 3 autografts). When patients with transplants were excluded, ove rall survival was longer in Group 1 both at 3 years and 5 years (P = 0.05). In conclusion, despite patient advanced age and lower dose of Ara-C, the i darubicin-containing treatment was superior to the other regimens.