A. Liston et al., Phylogenetics of Pinus (Pinaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences, MOL PHYL EV, 11(1), 1999, pp. 95-109
A 650-bp portion of the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer r
egion was sequenced in 47 species of Pinus, representing all recognized sub
sections of the genus, and 2 species of Picea and Cathaya as outgroups. Par
simony analyses of these length variable sequences were conducted using a m
anual alignment, 13 different automated alignments, elision of the automate
d alignments, and exclusion of all alignment ambiguous sites. High and mode
rately supported clades were consistently resolved across the different ana
lyses, while poorly supported clades were inconsistently recovered. Compari
son of the topologies highlights taxa of particularly problematic placement
including Pinus nelsonii and P. aristata. Within subgenus Pinus, there is
moderate support for the monophyly of a narrowly circumscribed subsect. Pin
us (=subsect. Sylvestres) and strong support for a clade of North and Centr
al American hard pines. The Himalayan P. roxburghii may be sister species t
o these "New World hard pines," which have two well-supported subgroups, su
bsect. Ponderosae and a clade of the remaining five subsections. The positi
on of subsect. Contortae conflicts with its placement in a chloroplast DNA
restriction site study. Within subgenus Strobus there is consistent support
for the monophyly of a broadly circumscribed subsect. Strobi (including: P
. krempfii and a polyphyletic subsect. Cembrae) derived from a paraphyletic
grade of the remaining soft pines. Relationships among subsects. Gerardian
ae, Cembroides, and Balfourianae are poorly resolved. Support for the monop
hyly of subgenus Pinus and subgenus Strobus is not consistently obtained. (
C) 1999 Academic Press.