Fm. Mutlu et al., A comparative study of recurrent pterygium surgery - Limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation versus mitomycin C with conjunctival flap, OPHTHALMOL, 106(4), 1999, pp. 817-821
Objective: To compare the recurrence rate following treatment of recurrent
pterygia using one of two techniques-limbal conjunctival autograft transpla
ntation versus low-dose intraoperative mitomycin C (0.2 mg/ml) combined wit
h conjunctival flap closure.
Design: Randomized clinical trial.
Participants: Eighty-one patients with recurrent pterygia treated by limbal
conjunctival autograft transplantation (n = 41) or mitomycin C combined wi
th conjunctival flap (n = 40) participated.
Intervention: Limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation or low-dose int
raoperative mitomycin C application with conjunctival flap technique was pe
rformed on recurrent pterygium cases.
Main Outcome Measures: Recurrence of pterygium and postoperative complicati
ons.
Results: During mean follow-up periods of 16 +/- 1.9 and 15.5 +/- 1.5 month
s, six recurrences (14.6%) in the limbal conjunctival autograft transplanta
tion group and five recurrences (12.5%) in the mitomycin C group were obser
ved (P = 0.77). The difference between the mean ages of recurrent (26.4 +/-
8.0 years) and nonrecurrent (35.8 +/- 11.9 years) cases for all patients w
as statistically significant (P = 0.014). Technically, limbal conjunctival
autograft transplantation seemed to be more difficult. The most frequent co
mplication in limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation was graft edema
, whereas that in the mitomycin C group was superficial keratitis.
Conclusion: Both techniques showed similar recurrence rates in the treatmen
t of recurrent pterygia. Although technically easier to perform, further fo
llow-up is necessary to determine the long-term safety of low-dose intraope
rative mitomycin C with conjunctival flap closure. The surgeon's familiarit
y with either procedure should determine the method of choice.