It is generally acknowledged that humans display highly variable sensitivit
y to pain, including variable responses to identical injuries or pathologie
s, The possible contribution of genetic factors has, however, been largely
overlooked. An emerging rodent literature documents the importance of genot
ype in mediating basal nociceptive sensitivity, in establishing a predispos
ition to neuropathic pain following neural injury, and in determining sensi
tivity to pharmacological agents and endogenous antinociception. One clear
finding from these studies is that the effect of genotype is at least parti
ally specific to the nociceptive assay being considered. In this report we
begin to systematically describe and characterize genetic variability of no
ciception in a mammalian species, Mus musculus. We tested 11 readily-availa
ble inbred mouse strains (129/J, A/J, AKR/J, BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ, C57BL/6J, C5
8/J, CBA/J, DBA/2J, RIIIS/J and SM/J) using 12 common measures of nocicepti
on. These included assays for thermal nociception (hot plate, Hargreaves' t
est, tail withdrawal), mechanical nociception (von Frey filaments), chemica
l nociception (abdominal constriction, carrageenan, formalin), and neuropat
hic pain (autotomy, Chung model peripheral nerve injury). We demonstrate th
e existence of clear strain differences in each assay, with 1.2 to 54-fold
ranges of sensitivity. All nociceptive assays display moderate-to-high heri
tability (h(2) = 0.30-0.76) and mediation by a limited number of apparent g
enetic loci. Data comparing inbred strains have considerable utility as a t
ool for understanding the genetics of nociception, and a particular relevan
ce to transgenic studies. (C) 1999 international Association for the Study
of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.