The main goal of current pain management approaches is to increase the pati
ents' quality of life by improving pain coping skills and by reducing the l
evels of disability in daily life, often despite persistent pain. Direct me
asurement of quality of life is of crucial importance in economic evaluatio
n research, in which not only is the estimation of financial costs and bene
fits included, but so is the evaluation of costs and benefits in terms of c
hanges in health states. The purpose of this study is to compare the psycho
metric qualities of two instruments for assessing patients' utilities, the
rating scale (RS) and the standard gamble (SG). Such instruments are design
ed for their application in economic evaluation research, but have seldomly
been used in chronic pain trials. Both methods provide a single measure be
tween 0 and 1. The relationship between these utility measures and descript
ive and domain-specific quality of life measures was examined in 133 fibrom
yalgia patients and 148 patients with chronic non-specific low back pain, M
ean utility score at baseline was 0.43 with the RS and 0.78 for the SG, The
correlation between both methods was found to be poor (r = 0.21). Both mea
sures appeared to be fairly stable in a 2-week test-retest period (intra cl
ass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.74 and 0.77). Scores on the descripti
on of patient's own health on six domains, global assessment of change and
domain specific measures correlated moderately with the RS scores and low w
ith the SG. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that 32% of the varia
nce in RS values and only 13% of the variance in SG utilities could be expl
ained by domain-specific measures. These results suggest an acceptable cons
truct validity for the RS but insufficient construct validity for the SG, V
aluations of ones own health appear only partially to be related to the ass
essment of the pain-specific measures and measures of distress. it can be c
oncluded that the RS and domain-specific measures assess partly different,
but nevertheless complementary aspects of health-related quality of life. I
t is therefore recommended to include in economic evaluation studies both d
omain-specific measures and valuation measures. Finally, in chronic musculo
skeletal pain patients, RS scores were found to be more responsive in detec
ting significant changes in preferences than SG scores. For use in patients
with chronic musculoskeletal pain, the RS is preferred to the SG for estab
lishing accurate decisions about the impact of new interventions on their h
ealth outcomes. (C) 1999 International Association for the Study of Pain. P
ublished by Elsevier Science B.V.