Quality is a term that is frequently used in postharvest studies but rarely
defined. What is more disturbing is that most researchers, producers, user
s, consultants and decision makers interested in fruit and vegetable qualit
y have a reasonably clear concept of the term, but there are as many differ
ent concepts as there are different perspectives in postharvest handling an
d distribution. A lack of appreciation for different perspectives on qualit
y may be the most limiting factor in improving the quality of fresh fruits
and vegetables as delivered to the consumer. The primary dividing line betw
een differing concepts of quality is orientation. Most postharvest research
ers, producers and handlers are product-oriented in that quality is describ
ed by specific attributes of the fruit or vegetable itself such as sugar co
ntent, color or firmness. Consumers, marketers and economists are more like
ly to be consumer-oriented in that quality is described by consumer wants a
nd needs. A continuation of the product orientation to quality will lead to
continued advances in postharvest technology in academic research. It is l
ikely that when major producers/distributors start to adopt a consumer orie
ntation to quality of fresh fruits and vegetables, competitors will either
follow or suffer the economic consequences. At this point then research sci
entists may need to reorient to remain relevant to commercial needs. (C) 19
99 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.