Forty-seven adults with mild learning disabilities (mild intellectual disab
ilities) attending day-centres and thirty-eight adults from the general pop
ulation viewed a videorecording of an accident. A day later the participant
s were interviewed using either a cognitive interview (CI) or a structured
interview (SI, a control interview). Compared with their counterparts with
learning disabilities, adults from the general population recalled more cor
rect information and made fewer confabulations about persons and objects. N
evertheless, the type of interview had an impact. For both groups, the CI w
as more effective than the SI in enhancing recall although, for the 'learni
ng disabilities' group, the CI also produced a disproportionate increase in
the reporting of person confabulations. All the same, the accuracy ratios
were similar across interview types (80% for the CI and 82% for the SI). It
is suggested that the CI could be helpful in assisting people with learnin
g disabilities to provide information about events they have seen.